Dear Americans

[lifeonqueen]

According to this column on Comic Book Resources, two Democrats, George Miller (D-California) and Reuben Hinojosa (D-Texas), inserted a clause in the College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007 (H.R. 4137) that would strip American colleges and universities of their federal funding if a single student downloads pirated music or video regardless of what computer network they use (their own, the college's, the local Starbuck's). I understand it will also require students to enroll in a legal music-sharing service, regardless of whether or not they want to download music and make the entertainment industry responsible for deciding what constitutes a violation, so they can bypass the courts and go straight to the Department of Education.

The relevant section of the bill - "SEC. 494. CAMPUS-BASED DIGITAL THEFT PREVENTION" - states:

SEC. 494. CAMPUS-BASED DIGITAL THEFT PREVENTION.

Part G of title IV (20 U.S.C. 1088 et seq.) is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

`(a) In General- Each eligible institution participating in any program under this title shall to the extent practicable--

`(1) make publicly available to their students and employees, the policies and procedures related to the illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted materials required to be disclosed under section 485(a)(1)(P); and

`(2) develop a plan for offering alternatives to illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal activity.

`(b) Grants-

`(1) PROGRAM AUTHORITY- The Secretary may make grants to institutions of higher education, or consortia of such institutions, and enter into contracts with such institutions, consortia, and other organizations, to develop, implement, operate, improve, and disseminate programs of prevention, education, and cost-effective technological solutions, to reduce and eliminate the illegal downloading and distribution of intellectual property. Such grants or contracts may also be used for the support of a higher education centers that will provide training, technical assistance, evaluation, dissemination, and associated services and assistance to the higher education community as determined by the Secretary and institutions of higher education.

`(2) AWARDS- Grants and contracts shall be awarded under paragraph (1) on a competitive basis.

`(3) APPLICATIONS- An institution of higher education or a consortium of such institutions that desires to receive a grant or contract under paragraph (1) shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require by regulation.

`(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and for each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years.'

Unfortunately, I can't figure out United States Code to tell whether or not the amendment would do what Steven Grant says it would do.

Still, anyone interested in keeping the RIAA/MPAA from riding roughshod over the privacy and education rights of millions of American students might want to call their representative and ask what the fuck is going on?