November 2012

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
lifeonqueen: (Canadiana - Spirit of Canada)
Thursday, June 21st, 2007 11:55 pm
Trooper Darryl Caswell, 25, Royal Canadian Dragoons (Bowmanville ON), killed Kandahar City, June 11, 2007.

Sergeant Christos Karigiannis, N/A, 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry (Laval PQ), killed Kandahar City, June 20, 2007.

Corporal Stephen Frederick Bouzane, 26, 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry (St. Albans NL and Toronto ON), killed Kandahar City, June 20, 2007.

Private Joel Vincent Wiebe, 22, 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry (Edmonton AB), killed Kandahar City, June 20, 2007.
lifeonqueen: (Canadiana - Go Army)
Tuesday, June 19th, 2007 09:59 am
My support for our Canadian Forces is unequivocal.

My support for the war in Afghanistan is not.

That is why for the past several months, I've been disturbed by the appearance of "Support Our Troops" magnetic decals on Toronto fire and ambulance service vehicles. I think I've written before that I find that kind of token gesture the worst sort of reflexive, blind patriotism (I think the post wast titled something like 'I'll cut down the fucking old oak tree before I tie a yellow ribbon'): one I'd find troubling even if it hadn't been co-opted by the American neo-right as a bullying tactic - support our war or you're not supporting our troops being a frequent rallying cry of the Bush Administration and adherents. Frankly, even in the most politically neutral of environments, this is one custom Canada really didn't need to import from the US.

Canadian hawks and regresso-cons have embraced the "Support Our Troops" message with the fervour you would expect of the Harper set, with their frantic desire to curry favour with America's lame-duck, criminal administration and for precisely the same reason - because everybody loves a soldier (one who's not pointing a gun at you or blowing up your children). Moreover, Canada's men and women in Afghanistan are enthusiastic volunteers, which makes their service that much more commendable and consequence-free for their political masters. Would the National Citizen's Coaltion or the Toronto Firefighter's Association be so quick to post billboards and decals declaring their support for our troops if it were John and Jane 905 being drafted to serve in Afghanistan rather than volunteers from rural Ontario, the West and the Maritimes?

Joe Warmington of the Toronto Sun, unsuprisingly outraged that Toronto Council would order political messaging stripped from public vehicles (one wonders how outraged he'd be if the decals read "Support Our Troops: Bring Them Home Alive" instead?), even pulls out the "like it or not, this country is at war" chestnut, as if a few hundred magnets is the deciding factor in our struggle with Islamo-fascism. Of course, he's also wrong: our country is most emphatically not at war, no more than the US is at war. If our country was at war, the burden of Canada's mission in Afghanistan would not be born by a dozen thousand or so military families across our country our 32 million. Is the US was at war, I can only assume that the Bush Administration wouldn't be trying for the fourth consecutive year to pacify Iraq with several hundred thousand fewer soldiers than the Pentagon originally estimated would be required to occupy and pacify Iraq. What's going on in Afghanistan and Iraq is imperialism on the cheap: military occupation with a side of development - missions that are in many ways designed and executed with the intention of shielding the public at home from the burdens and cost of war.

This didn't happen in 1942. This certainly didn't happen in 1918, when nearly 1 in 10 Canadian men never came home from serving in the Great War.

Whether or not it was the original intent, the "Support Our Troops" slogan has become a political rallying cry, a way of wrapping unpleasant truths up in a pretty ribbon. And one that has no place on public vehicles and especially not those providing emergency services to the public.

If there was nothing political about the slogan, why use it at all? The poppy is our national symbol of remembrance and non-partisan reminder of the triumphs and sacrifices of Canada's veterans but, then again, the people urging us to support our troops don't really want to think about what the consequences of that blind, unquestioning support may be, like more Canadian men and women, enthusiastic, dedicated and courageous volunteers, coming home covered by the flag instead of wearing it.

Bolstering military morale is not the responsibility of the Canadian public, questioning our government and demanding explanations and accountability from those governments when they order our Canadian Forces into danger is. And that is why I'll be damned if I let the Canadian government or the Toronto Fire Association or anyone else bully me into writing a blank cheque to support our troops being deployed to Afghanistan or anywhere else. My suppport for the Canadian Forces is unequivocal but it is not unquestioning - I demand to know why our troops are being sent around the world to fight and die; what my government expects to get out of their service and sacrifices; and how they expect to acheive their goals. Anything less is unacceptable.

So take your yellow magnet off my publicly-funded fire truck and stick it, eh?
lifeonqueen: (Canadiana - Bleeding Hearts)
Thursday, May 24th, 2007 12:14 am
Here's a question for the masses - why isn't the government telling us how many Afghans Canadian Forces have captured and turned over to Afghan security forces?

Mr. Harper's government tells us that the number is a "state secret" - secret from whom?

The Taliban? The Afghanistanis? Presumably not, since - in theory, anyway - these men are prisoners of the Afghan national government.

Canadian voters?

eta: Andrew Coyne, you are a worthy opponent, sir. Misguided, alas, but brilliant and incisive. However, I think Chantal Herbert could probably take you - especially if you keep up with the false analogies.

Afghanistan is neither World War I nor World War II for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is that our nation has not mobilized to fight in Afghanistan, our resources and our wealth has not been committed to fight in Afghanistan, and our government hasn't even the initimation of a suggestion of an idea of doing so - Mr. Harper is taking a page from Mr. Bush's playbook (who cribbed his notes from Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush Senior's actions in Kosovo and Gulf War I) and waging war on the cheap. Not in terms of dollars but in terms of lives.

I submit that no Canadian politician and certainly no Conservative government will ever make more than a token commitment to Afghanistan or any conflict where Canadian national interests, sovereignty and native citizenry are not directly threatened.

In World War I, one in eight Canadian men enlisted - One. In. Eight. When Canada had a population of less than 10 million. Today, Canada has a population of roughly 33 million and there are roughtly 2,500 Canadian Forces personnel deployed to Afghanistan.

2,500 soldiers tasked to do a job that would require at least a brigade, if not a division, to do properly (two to four times more soldiers than currnently deployed). 2.500 men and women assigned to a mission that has become the centerpiece of Mr. Harper's foreign policy. A mission to which he has personally committed himself - 2,500 from a nation of 33,000,000.

And that is only one of the ways in which Afghanistan in not World War I.
lifeonqueen: (Default)
Monday, April 9th, 2007 11:37 pm
As the square kilometre around the Canadian Vimy Memorial is actually Canadian soil - "the free gift in perpetuity of the French nation to the people of Canada" - that means that the Third Reich actually occupied one square kilometre of Canada during World War II.

Nazi fuckers.

I wonder what it was like for the Canadians fighting in France in 1944, what the sons and younger brothers of the men who fought at Ypres, the Somme, Vimy, Passchendale and throughout Canada's Hundred Days, felt to fight to retake the same soil their countrymen fought and died for a bare generation before? Someone must have written about it, I suppose.

Meanwhile, it's a sign of how much the world has changed in 60 years, Canadian soldiers are looking at leasing German tanks for service in Khandahar (hey, we're a northern nation, our tanks aren't air conditioned for use in deserts, okay? They were bought to fight the Soviets along the West German front, eh).

At the same time, I watched CBC's World War I documentary, The Great War, a look at Canadians in the First World War through the eyes of their descendants. The Great War is a combination of military history, family reminiscences, recreations with a touch of reality TV-style living history mixed in. As I watched, I thought about the traditions linking the Canadians of 1917 and those of 2007. Then, when the whistle blew, the piper would climb to the top of the trench and play the regiment forward into battle. Today, the strains of the pipes are still heard on Canadian bases, in the laments that mark the journey of our dead home again.
lifeonqueen: (Canadiana - The Red Ensign)
Sunday, April 8th, 2007 11:59 pm
At dawn on Easter Monday, 9 April, 1917, 27,000 soldiers of the Canadian Expeditionary Force attacked the entrenched German position on Vimy Ridge, just north of the town of Arras in the Pas de Calais.

Fighting together as a corps for the first time, at 5:30 in the morning, 15,000 Canadians begin their advance toward the German lines under a creeping barrage of artillery. The Germans took Vimy Ridge in their initial sweep into France in 1914 and spent the next three years fortifying the ridge with networks of trenches, tunnels and concrete machine gun posts, strung together with tens of thousands of metres of barbed wire. An attempt to take the ridge in 1915 ended in failure, costing French forces more than 150,000 casualties. A year later, the British were similarly repulsed. There is a sense that the British High Command believes the Canadian Expeditionary Force will fair no better. But General Arthur Currie, first Canadian to be promoted General in the course of the war, is determined not to repeat the mistakes of previous battles.

Currie is Chief of Staff to General Byng, the British commander of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, and planning the attack on Vimy falls to him. Foremost in Currie's mind is the bloodbath of the Somme. The battle, which raged throughout the summer and fall of the previous year, cost the Allies more than 600,000 men before ending in stalemate. The four Canadian divisions alone lost 25,000 men killed and wounded. But many units suffered even greater losses. On the first day of the Somme, 1 July, 1916, the Royal Newfoundland Regiment lost 710 of 800 men and all their officers killed. Currie is determined to do better for Canada at Vimy.

General Currie prepares tirelessly for the battle. The early months of the 1917 are spent planning the assault and preparing and training the men. Then, on 2 April, 1917, the Canadian and British artillery unleash the largest artillery barrage in history to date, shelling the German positions on the ridge for a week. The Allies fire more than a million shells and the noise from the shelling in loud enough to be heard in Southern England, 100 miles away. The Germans troops entrenched on the ridge refer to this bombardment as "The Week of Suffering."

Then, at 5:30 a.m. on 9 April, 1917, the Canadian attack begins. The first wave of 15,000 men goes over the top, advancing along a six kilometre front under the cover of a "creeping barrage" of artillery fire - a moving bombardment targeted just ahead of the Canadians, covering their advance across No Man's Land. The Germans respond with withering machine gun fire but Currie's men are prepared with countering fire that pins the Germans down in their trenches. Three of the four Canadian divisions achieve their objectives in two hours. The fourth division takes the highest point of the ridge, Hill 145, by the end of the day.

Over the next five days, the Canadians, reinforced by a second wave of 12,000 men, sweep the Germans from the ridge. By the time the battle is over, 14 April, 1917, the Canadians will have taken "more ground, more guns and more prisoners than any previous British offensive." Canadian casualties at Vimy Ridge total 10,602 with 3,598 killed.

Hearing of the victory, a French soldier declared that it was impossible. When he was told that it was the Canadians who took the hill, it is said he cried "ah, les Canadiens, c'est possible!" At Ypres and the Somme, fighting with British units under British commanders, the Canadians had gained a reputation as tough fighters. Fighting together as a corps for the first time at Vimy Ridge, the Canadians proved themselves the finest troops on the western front. During the final 100 days of the war, the four divisions of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, eventually numbering 100,000 men, would go on to defeat or force into retreat 47 German divisions.

From a country of eight million souls, eventually 500,000 Canadians would serve overseas during World War I. As a British Dominion, Canada automatically was at war when Great Britain declared war on Germany on 4 August, 1914. But it was a nation to which her veterans returned in 1918, a nation forged in the crucible of battle on Flanders Felds and in French trenches where Canadian men fought and died together as a Canadian army for Canadian officers for the first time in our history. From their sacrifice was born the spirit of our sovereign Canada.

90 years later, we remember. Then, those who fought it called World War I "the war to end all wars." 21 years late, the nations of Europe were again at war and Canadians crossed the oceans to fight the blind ideologies of hatred and intolerance, to fight those that would victimize the innocent and persecute the helpless. And today, 62 years after the last World War, Canadian soldiers are fighting and dying in a foreign land once again.

On Easter Sunday, six Canadian soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. Tens of thousands of men who fell in the fields of France and Belgium never came home again and the bodies of thousands more were never found, sucked down into mud like tidal pools. And for some, found but laid to rest without a name to mark their passing. Today, we can count our losses in the dozens and each man and woman is brought home again, with an efficiency that grows more cruelly routine with each repetition. But the sacrifice and the loss remains the same, for one fallen soldier as for one thousand:
They shall not grow old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
We will remember them.
lifeonqueen: (Misc - Caravaggio)
Friday, January 19th, 2007 05:44 pm
I taught myself how to calculate weighted averages this afternoon so I could find out the average age of Canadian, American and British personnel killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

FWIW, based on my calculations:

  • CDN: 29.8 years - most common rank: corporal (Afghanistan only)

  • US: 28.7 years (Afghanistan), 26.1 years (Iraq) - most common rank: sergeant/staff sergeant (Afghanistan), specialist (US Army)/lance corporal (USMC) (Iraq)

  • UK: 28.2 years (Afghanistan & Iraq) - most common rank: lance corporal (equivalent to CDN corporal/US sergeant)


  • Raw statistics courtesy of icausalties.org.