Oops.
Hi. Been awhile.
Sorry about that. The end of August through September so far has been a little nuts. I packed a whole summer's worth of cottaging into the end of August and then it was time for International Hussy Weekend in Rochester over Labour Day Weekend.
cretkid hosted the annual gathering of
thassalia,
rubberneck,
fbf and I at Casa a Rock Doc (now with fire). A fine time was had by all I think and this time I was the only one who came down with Captain Trips (original flavour). Two weeks later, I've finally managed to shake my cold in time for the first meeting of the Polaris concom - announced guests:
Ben Browder, Adam Baldwin and Armin Shimmerman.
Yes, Ben Browder... 8D
In other news, if you haven't seen
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, I recommend it. To paraphrase the great Kim Pine, if Michael Cera's career had a face, I'd punch it. So I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed
SP. As an insufferable Torontonian, I loved seeing Toronto playing Toronto on the big screen in a movie that proudly declares its location and influences - no passing Osgood Hall off as an Opera House or made-up hospital and university names (WTF,
Rookie Blue). Michael Cera is an effective slacker hero but the movie really belongs to the supporting cast of Alison Pill, Keiran Culkin and Ellen Wong as Scott's bandmate, roommate and fake high school girlfriend respectively. Unfortunately,
Scott Pilgrim the movie suffers from the same problem as
Scott Pilgrim the comic book - you're never quite sure what Ramona sees in Scott and she suffers from a not-dire but disappointing lack of agency in the third act. Never totally objectified but never truly in charge of her own destiny, Ramona coasts on Mary Elizabeth Winstead's ability to project a depth and certain badassery to what could easily have become a rote 'dream girl' cipher. Director and adapter Edgar Wright never really pushes the rebarbative qualities of Scott and Ramona, which undercuts the climax somewhat but if you liked the book, you will love
Scott Pilgrim vs the World. For the rest of us,
Scott Pilgrim is well-made summer flick with more than enough fun to overcome an underwritten female lead.
30 (non-consecutive) Days of Writing
8.
What's your favorite genre to write? To read?Lately, fanfic (if you can call it a genre; I think you can) is winning by volume. However, while my fanfic is all SF (
Farscape, Roswell, The Sarah Connor Chronicles), my original writing is a mixed bag: contemporary horror, historical fiction, short fiction, poetry, fantasy. I think my favourite to write it fantasy. I like the grandeur of high fantasy, the ability to blow life up to maximum magnification it provides without the limitations and responsibilities of historical fiction. Historical fiction is life recreated in miniature, a revelation of exquisite detail. Fantasy is high drama, operatic and soaring; self-gratifying to write.
That said, I firmly believe there's a special hell for writers who create quasi-medieval settings without the least understanding of medieval society, economy and culture. Perhaps it's not surprising that my favourite genre to read is actually non-fiction, particularly histories of the late middle ages and the Italian Renaissance. I find books like
The Devil's Broker and
A Distant Mirror are not only more compelling and more dramatic than contemporary fantasy fiction, they're better written, while Caterian Sforza would find Cersei Lannister a silly and insipid creature.
I'm currently reading
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson, which is a Swedish Twilight for adults with a Joss Whedon size zero faux-riotgrrl playing second fiddle to the Gary Stu protagonist and depictions of grotesque sexualized violence replacing
Twilight's angsty teen vampires in love.
Solar by Ian McEwan, which is a hard book to like even thought McEwan's prose is itself a rich reward for reading. The protagonist, Michael Beard, is a loathsome solipsist of such extent that I rather hope the book reflects some sort of psychic purge for the author rather than think McEwan finds such a figure worthy of his time.
The Dancers Dancing by Eilis ni Dhuibne, an exquisitely observed
bildungsroman set against the particularly Irish backdrop of an summer college in the
Gaeltacht. It's taken me a tremendously long time to read as ni Dhuibhne's sharply observed depictions of the lives of 13-year-old girls has the habit of triggering unpleasant flashbacks to high school.
9.
How do you get ideas for your characters? Describe the process of creating them.I just do? My ideas for stories tend to start as a sentence, a line of dialogue in my head. It repeats until I know who's speaking it or who's point of view I'm seeing and I build out from there. Normally by the time I can put a few paragraphs down, I've a sketch in my mind of who the character is. Over time, the sketch is finished, inked in and coloured... and then I normally throw it out and start over with a line here and a shadow there. Secondary characters, like baby horses, tend to emerge more or less fully-formed and capable of running on their own within moments. They are also more likely to be based on people I've met or inspired by other characters (fictional and otherwise). Protagonists are definitely anthropoid creatures and need time and effort and resources to thrive. The diptych of Katharyne and Rosyaln are probably the two protagonists who've emerged most fully-formed and changed least over time: Katharyne because she's drawn rather strongly from Cate Blanchett's Elizabeth I (and less so her historical counterpart) and Rosalyn because she was intended to be
Not-the-heroine-of-every-sword-and-sorcery-novel-I'd-read-since-high-school, which is rather a more concrete character description than I normally have to begin. Since then, though, Rosalyn's character has been refined some with experiences thieved from Héloïse d’Argenteuil and Eileen Power's seminal
a-chem Medieval Women.
( The Questions (and answers) )