lifeonqueen: (Wolves - Selene by grumpybear 1031)
Monday, February 2nd, 2009 02:10 pm
Just when I thought my interest in DOLLHOUSE couldn't get lower, FOX releases this promo for THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLE and DOLLHOUSE on Fridays...

Frankly, if I didn't already watch TSCC, I'd avoid both shows on general principle. Hey, Mr. 'I Am A Big-Time Feminist' Whedon - do you not have any control over how your show is marketed? Or do you just not care?
lifeonqueen: (Misc - Squirrelly Wrath)
Thursday, July 24th, 2008 03:20 pm
Dear Comic Shop Guy:

a) My gender has nothing to do with whether or not I liked The Dark Knight.

b) I've been reading Batman comics since I was five-years-old. In fact, I've probably been reading Batman comics as long as you have.

c) According to the article printed on BoxOfficeMojo.com, "Warner Bros' research indicated that 52 percent of the audience was male and that there was an even split between those over and under 25 years old", which means 48 per cent of the audience (or about $100 million of the current North American box office gross) was from female movie-goers. According to your reasoning, they were:

  • i) not actually female

  • ii) not a significant part of the intended audience, and

  • iii) not knowlegdeable enough in the Batman mythos to enjoy the film anyway.


  • So either there are several million female-identifying transexuals emerging very confused from movie theatres across North America right now or you are an ignorant, sexist jerk who's full of shit.

    Also, if you're going to make a gender-based pronouncement on my likes and dislikes, and you don't even know me, talk to *me*. Don't address yourself to the guy I'm talking to, rude-ass.

    In closing, go fuck yourself. You're the reason why I'm a feminist, you useless douchebag.

    ~ LoQ

    PS - if you work in the "film industry", you're paying $.99 an hour to use the computer at the local comic shop why now? You self-aggrandizing, punk-ass wannabe.
    lifeonqueen: (BSG - Cranky by Ancarett)
    Saturday, September 15th, 2007 01:37 am
    Jesus, everytime I think maybe I'll check out a comic book for auld lange syne (or because Greg Rucka, that bastard, waited until I quit comics to finally drop Queen & Country no. 32 - No worries, dude, I've only been waiting a freaking year, I can do the extra few months/years until/if the trade comes out on my head *rassumfrassum*), I see shit like this and I'm pissed off all over again.

    And, as we've established, Perpetually Pissed-Off does not accessorize well with my new outlook on life.

    That said, domestic violence? Is not fucking cool, Intertoobz.

    Imagine that instead of Canary clocking Green Arrow, it was GA laying a smack on his lady-love. Would anyone consider that appropriate foreplay? Or more to the point, would it get printed? True, we live in the era of B&D Marvel covers but people now generally agree that wife/girlfriend/child beaters are scumbags.

    So why do we still put up with this bullshit in fiction where it's not only okay for a woman to smack around her (male) partner, it's considered cute? Because here's a reality check for you - it's not. When your partner hits you, it's not cute, it's not romantic and it sure as hell doesn't put you in the mood. And it really doesn't matter who's doing the hitting - it's a violation of trust, it's hurtful and it's wrong. For both sexes.

    I'm also pissed because the whole 'slap/wrestle/clinch' gag infantalizes the female character, implying that she is unable to tell the difference between anger and desire until she is shown her 'true' feelings by the more dominant and assured male, totally unfazed, of course, by either the slap or her attempts to resist his seduction (bitch, please *eyeroll*). As a 'literary' - and we use the term loosely indeed here - trope, this shit just barely plays in Gone with the Wind but there's no excuse to fall back on such trite, lazy and negative characterizations today. Particularly not when the female character in question is supposed to be one of the best martial artists in the world. When I studied Aikido, my sensei solemly instructed us that our training was a serious matter and not something that we showed off to friends at parties - what we were learning could result in someone being seriously hurt - but it's okay for Black Canary to be slapping her fiancee around?

    Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

    Here's the thing about equality - it cuts both ways, hence the word "equal". It isn't wrong for a man to hit a woman because she's smaller than him - it just makes it that much more heinous - it's wrong because violence is wrong. And if it's wrong for a man, it's wrong for a woman. And everytime we wink and accept a lesser or a double standard where women are concerned, we undermine that fundamental tennet and make it that much easier to excuse other acts of violence.
    lifeonqueen: (Misc - David by Bernini)
    Thursday, August 23rd, 2007 01:21 pm
    Okay, Flist, I guess I know why you didn't tell me about this one back in the day - you would have been able to see the mushroom cloud as my outrage went Nuclear from Saskatoon. Fortunately for Southern Ontario, I'm Bright. And. Shiny. now and I can manage my outrage in a much more constructive fashion by vowing never to spend another cent on a Todd McFarlane product ever again.

    I honestly don't know what to say about male creators who seem to think that sticking an "intended for an adult audience" disclaimer on sexist, objectifying and demeaning presentations of women (or girls, in this case) makes it okay.

    free expression/responsible expression )

    McFarlane )

    Alan Moore )

    responsible expression/free expression )

    FWIW...
    lifeonqueen: (BSG - Cranky by Ancarett)
    Wednesday, June 13th, 2007 09:30 pm
    And why I'm bothering, I'm not sure. Nevertheless, one more time, repeat after me:

    Characters in original works are not and can not be considered
    "Mary Sues".



    Anyone who says otherwise has no fucking idea what they're talking about and therefore are disqualified from participating in any further conversation.

    Furthermore, Wesley Crusher is not a valid example of a "Mary Sue" in an original work: Star Trek: The Next Generation is itself a derivative work (which means that WC may be, in fact, a "Mary Sue". This point, however, is not germane at the moment).

    To anyone who argues that Starbuck or Elizabeth Swann or whoever is a "Mary Sue" because the character is, in your opinion, flawless, always right, always wins, *cough*a female hero or POV character*cough* - not, of course, that misogyny has anything to do with this discussion (Although note we're discussing "Mary Sues") - I have a single question: Is Superman a "Mary Sue"? Is Batman? What about Luke Skywalker? Aragorn?

    And if Starbuck is a "Mary Sue", what the fuck does that make Captain Kirk?

    Assholes.
    lifeonqueen: (Canadiana - Fuck the People!)
    Monday, April 16th, 2007 10:52 am
    And speaking of Civil Wars, or rather civil wars, I suppose "killing them all and letting God sort it out" would be neither a particularly Christian nor productive way of responding to the ADQ's call to reopen debate on the Constitution but OMFGWTFBBQFTW101010101!!! - The. Temptation.

    To reiterate: Stephen Harper is a lying, neoconservative ideogogue who needs to be cracked in the face with a shovel and staked on the parliamentary lawn to be nibbled at by gay Albanian mountain goats - three words: Wait. Times. Guarantee.

    Meanwhile Mario Dumont is an opportunistic, populist bottomfeeder from a province that already has far too many of all three in politics. And someone needs to tell Stephane Dion that this is not, in fact, an episode of The West Wing and no one is going to miraculously realize that you are the smartest, most honest and honourable man in the room just in the nick of time. SACK UP FOR CHRIST'S SAKE, MAN - you're fighting the political undead, grab a freaking machete and start chopping off some heads already. Lord!

    eta: According to my tags list, I have not mocked Stephen Harper for almost a year - The. Shame.
    lifeonqueen: (DC - THE DARK FUCKING KNIGHT)
    Thursday, March 15th, 2007 04:32 pm
    OH, GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK - just when, exactly, did Powergirl pop out to get breast implants? Grow the fuck up already, Turner.

    And I won't even go into the implications of a fully-grown woman being referred to as "girl" in perpetuity.

    C'mon, I appreciate the heroic proportions of comic book characters as much as the next guy/girl/whatever but there are limits. Or should be - I keep forgetting, Greg Land still gets work. I wonder how long it would take for the hue and cry to raise if DC or Marvel or any publisher started routinely publishing similar grostequely exaggerated and sexualized images of male characters, like this scan from Girl-Wonder.org?

    Eta: changed the link since some people were getting redirected to Disney's website - odd since I wasn't trying to hotlink the file.
    lifeonqueen: (Misc - Squirrelly Wrath)
    Thursday, February 1st, 2007 09:28 pm
    If there's one thing that distinguishes me from Fandon-at-Large it is that I do not like Harry Potter. I do not like Harry Potter, I do not like him in a book, I do not like him on my screen, I do not like him in a sook, I do not like him wearing green, I do not like Harry Potter anywhere, I do not like him and I do not care.*

    Needless to say, I did not appreciate the e-mail from Borders telling me that I need to order my copy of the last Harry Potter novel likeNOWOMGWTFBBQ!!!1!RON+HERMIONEEE4EVER.

    No.

    Fuck that.

    Go away.

    Really.

    *sigh*

    It's going to be a long six fucking months.

    *facepalm*




    *Apologies to Dr. Seuss and the English language-at-large